Foreign Secretary
Parliamentary House of Commons
London
SW1A
23rd April 2015
Dear Mr Hammond
My 39th letter to you!
As with the previous 38 this one will
yield no response from you. Nonetheless, it will be on record and the day will
come when you will be held accountable for your silence, your inaction, the
failure in your duty of care to a citizen of the United Kingdom.
I arrived back in Cambodia late yesterday to be
greeted by an email from Stuart Poole, Customer Service Manager to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman.
Dear Mr Ricketson
Mr David Fletcher’s
complaint about the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO)
Thank you for providing us with further
information in relation to Mr Fletcher’s complaint.
We have decided to investigate Mr Fletcher’s
complaint about the FCO. Please find attached a letter to Mr Fletcher for your
information.
We have also been made aware of your website. On
that website you have published copies of our correspondence to you and Mr
Fletcher; this includes the names of our staff members.
Our investigations, and the decisions whether or
not we should investigate, are conducted in private as Parliament requires. We
ask you to respect that by not naming our staff and not placing correspondence
we send to you and Mr Fletcher in the public domain. Please remove the
references to our staff members from your website.
If you continue to place copies of our
correspondence on your website during our consideration of the case then we may
have to decide whether you are acting responsibly as Mr Fletcher’s
representative. That may result in us not accepting you as a suitable person to
represent Mr Fletcher. We would then have to ask him to find another
representative.
We would much rather avoid having to do this as
we recognise that Mr Fletcher is isolated and it may be difficult for him to
make suitable alternative arrangements. I hope, therefore, to avoid further
unnecessary complications and stress for Mr Fletcher during this period, you
will exercise restraint and allow us to accept you as his representative.
Yours sincerely
Stuart Poole
Customer Service
Manager
Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman
Millbank Tower
Millbank
London
My response to Mr Poole was
as follows:
Dear Stuart Poole
You will be aware that one month ago,
in desperation, having given up hope that anyone was going to help him
(including the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman ) Mr Fletcher
attempted to end his life. He did not succeed and, after being in a coma for 8
days, has been slowly recovering. He has been abandoned by the Cambodian
Embassy and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office - up to and including Foreign
Secretary Phillip Hammond. The FCO even went do far as to destroy evidence in
his case in the form of Mr Fletcher's passport. Your office has done nothing to
assist Mr Fletcher despite his many requests and despite your office having
been copied on around 35 letters sent to Mr Hammond. And now, at the 11th hour,
you are offering to assist Mr Fletcher as long as I - a filmmaker and
journalist - do not identify any of those who have played a role this past few
years in treating Mr Fletcher with contempt.
Given the incompetence and
indifference revealed by the FCO I intend, with Mr Fletcher's permission, to
refer the matter of his 'accidentally destroyed' passport to the British police
in an attempt to find out which of the stories told by various members of the
FCO regarding Mr Fletcher's passport is true - if, indeed, any of them are.
In short I will now attempt to
achieve what your office could have achieved months ago - namely to find out
the true story of what happened to Mr Fletcher's passport . Who gave the order
to destroy it? And who told FCO staff to lie about it and then, when I catch
them out lying, tell me that they will have no further communication with me?
You know all this and have done
nothing.
Mr Fletcher has been returned to the
jail despite his ill health and need for further hospital treatment. And not
one person from the British Embassy has shown the slightest interest in his
fate, his well-being or offered to assist him in any way this past month.
Of one thing you can be fairly
certain - Mr Fletcher will not fail the next time he decides that death at his
own hand is preferable to a slow death in prison for a crime that the FCO has
known for close to 5 years he did not commit.
best wishes
James Ricketson
Three days ago Mr Fletcher was
returned from hospital to the jail. This morning I visited him there. He is
much improved since I last saw him – both in mind and body. And his fighting
spirit has returned.
Mr Fletcher told me that two days ago
he had finally had delivered to him the documents that were supposed to be
delivered in Jan this year. He has not had an opportunity to go through these
papers as yet. We will go through them together during the next few days.
Mr Fletcher told me that a
representative of the British Embassy (a Khmer woman) visited him two days ago
in jail. She was very supportive and compassionate in her responses to his
plight. She told Mr Fletcher that she had visited him in hospital each day that
he was unconscious – as did I. I did not see her but Mr Fletcher believes that
she did so and is very appreciative of her concern for his well-being. He is
also very appreciative of the support he has received throughout this past
month from the prison guards and fellow inmates. As I am sure the Khmer woman
from the Embassy will confirm, Mr Fletcher is an old-fashioned English
gentleman who treats everyone he encounters with courtesy and respect. He is,
in person, far removed from the monster that Peter Hogan, Scott Neeson and
members of the 4th estate have presented him to be to the public at
large.
I informed Mr Fletcher that his
lawyer had managed to obtain a date for a hearing of his case – to determine
whether or not he should be entitled to a fair trial midway through his 10 year
jail sentence. This is being referred to as a ‘re-trial’ but, as you know, as
you and the FCO have known for close to 5 years, there has been no trial at all
at which Mr Fletcher was in attendance or in a position to present evidence in
his defense or to have Yang Dany, his alleged victim, cross-examined. He has
not even been interviewed by the police of an investigating judge this past
five years.
The hearing will be held on 7th
May – two weeks away. As you know Thierry Darnaudet’s ‘child protection NGO’,
Action Pour les Enfants, has sent Yang Dany to China so that she cannot testify
or be cross-examined. This leaves the matter of Mr Fletcher’s passport,
containing evidence that he was not in Cambodia at the time of the alleged
rapes, as a key piece of evidence. The Foreign & Commonwealth Office has
acknowledged that it destroyed Mr Fletcher’s passport and it would be very useful for his defense
to have a letter to that effect from the FCO. Could you please instruct your
staff to provide such a letter?
To date all of Mr Fletcher’s
experiences with the Cambodian legal system have been disastrous – to put it
mildly. And whilst he has hopes that on 7th May the judges may
finally grant his wish to be tried in accordance with the Cambodian Code of
Criminal Procedure, he is also aware that there are many people and
organizations, including the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, that would have a
lot of egg on their faces if he were to be found innocent after so much effort
has been put into his pursuit and prosecution. Mr Fletcher is well aware of the
way in which ‘justice’ is administered in Cambodian and is prepared for the
worst.
Mr Fletcher told me this morning, in
no uncertain terms, that he was only interested in walking out of jail an
innocent man. He is not interested in receiving a pardon from the King – one
path that has been suggested to him of late. He is likewise not interested in
being repatriated to the UK on the pretext that, at age 70, he is too old to be
in a Cambodian prison – another avenue he has been told is open to him. “I
either leave this prison an innocent man or as a corpse,” were Mr Fletcher’s
exact words. I understand that Mr Fletcher said much the same to the Khmer
woman from the British Embassy who visited him two days ago.
It is up to you, Mr Hammond, to
remove your head from the sand, take notice of this matter and instruct your
staff to stop being obstructive and to abide by their duty of care to a citizen
of the United Kingdom – namely to do all they can to see to it that Mr Fletcher
receives a fair trial.
best wishes
James Ricketson
Well, it seems that the British Gov. is coming to terms with the David Fletcher case but does not want anyone in it's State Org. to be named so he/she can't be held responsable at a later date for the non- or wrong doing in David Fletchers case. It seems the "let him rot in jail " period is over and British State Representatives are scared about the consequences their silence will have on them later on in their life.
ReplyDeleteMay i suggest that you, Mr. Ricketson stick to the line you have set here and NOT remove a single Document or Name of a Person in order to preserve TRUTH.
I am far from seeking revenge about their attitude but i am also adamant about preserving the Truth of the Events that lead to this point. Some may call it a "let them rot in Office" attitude which they truly deserve.
Dear Anonymous 5.33
ReplyDeleteI have no intention of removing anything from my blog.
Whilst I have a certain amount of sympathy for those who, in their obstructiveness, have been simply obeying orders from above, they could have chosen NOT to work for the FCO if the actions they were asked to perform were against their moral principles.
Ultimately, the Foreign Secretary Mr Phillip Hammond (Captain of the good ship FCO) must take responsibility for the injustices suffered by Mr Fletcher at the FCO's hands. He has had ample opportunity this past six months to step in and tell his staff to spot being obstructive. He has not.
However, the fat lady has far from sung yet. The coalition that has done all in its power this past five years to prevent Mr Fletcher from being given a fair trial has a vested interest in his never getting one and, between them, are sufficiently cashed up to guarantee that no trial takes place.
On the other hand, should Mr Fletcher get a fair trial, he may be lucky enough to appear before judges who have an interest in facts, evidence and truth and who have no desire to see an innocent man spend the last years of his life in jail.
We shall see!
James, I understand your "certain amount of sympathy for those who, in their obstructiveness, have been simply obeying orders from above", but at the end it's Philip Hammock and Philip Hammock alone who's responsible and should personally be held accountable for the actions (or the lack lack of actions) of the FCO in this case.
DeleteOn the other hand, everyone has its own conscience and has the moral obligation to speak out whenever orders from above conflict with their own moral standards. Many people have been copied in when you wrote letters or posted a new blog entry, but many recipients decided to keep silent.
David Fletcher has been named and shamed in public. I see no reason why the privacy of those who kept silent for so long must now be protected.
And again, if Phillip Fucking Hammock would've just replied his emails, none of the hard working British government staff would've been mentioned by name. Phillip Hammock is the only person responsible.
James, I sincerely hope you don't remove anything from this blog until Phillip Fucking Hammock starts signing email replies with his own name!
May 7th. That's very good news. So happy to hear that wheels are turning and David finally (hopefully) gets his his day in court ! ! !
ReplyDeleteSorry to rain on your parade everyone but there is no way that Aple will allow a trial to take place. The risk is too high. They have sent their star witness to China so she couldnt testify in court which means the case would have to be thrown out for lack of evidence. Or Aple could bring Yang Dany back from China but then she'd be cross-examined and maybe tell the truth. Aple can't afford for the truth to come out as it would lose too much face. There is too much money at stake for Aple to allow a trial to happen
ReplyDeleteThe Fletcher-hating 'let him rot in jail brigade' seems to have gone very quiet. There has been no abuse for a couple of days now! Mmmmmmmm.....!!!!????
ReplyDeleteIt likely isn't a brigade at all, most likely only a single person.
ReplyDeleteWe are still here - just tried of replying to your fucking dribble over a dirty sex offender.
ReplyDeleteIs there anything that Neeson won't lie about. Please look at this article that I saw on the internet - its from the Herald Sun in Australia.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/gina-rinehart-opens-up-on-cambodian-daughters-saved-from-life-of-extreme-poverty/story-fni0fit3-1227319692437
Gina Rinehart is calling some Cambodian girls she is supporting as her daughters. Rinehart and Neeson state that the girls are orphans and that Rinehart started the HOPE scholarship program.
I know from a very close friend who works in the NGO sector that the Scholarship program was started by Steve Morrish and SISHA years ago and Rinehart came in and gave some funding when it had already started. The girls aren't orphans at all - they all have parents and family. I just called my friend to confirm before I put my comments on this blog. She said that the girls were selected by Morrish to get a scholarship because they finished number 1 academically in their province school and come from very poor families. They didn't have the ability to fund university so they were given a scholarship.
I dont normally comment on this blog but these are just plain and deliberate lies and it makes me sick that they can get away with it. I know Steve. He won't comment on this but I certainly hope he finds out about the lies in the article and says something. Its just straight out fraud by Neeson and by Rinehart.
Disgusting!
Its been proven that Neeson is a born lier. He has an ex criminal working with him who also has lied. Talk about a group of scumbags.
DeleteAnd you are the fine upstanding citizen are you?(Never mind that you can't spell liar). If you want to defame people, have the courage to sign your name to it, you sniveling coward.
DeleteNow those complicit with the injustice David Fletcher and Matt Harland have received are worried about their reputation.
ReplyDeleteThey should be, because of their non-action or indifference in this case.
Even worse, the Head of the FCO Mr Hammond, would rather entertain himself at cocktail parties than defend the rights of one of his citizens. He should roast in Hell for eternety. And get fired at once !