You are a
member of the Cambodian Children’s Fund board. You are also "Chief Operations Officer."
On the
CCF website your role is described in the following words:
“Bob leads CCF’s
global operations, implementing systems to enable an integrated and co-ordinated
approach and providing a high degree of transparency and accountability, good
governance and sustainability.”
My
first question is:
“Do you believe that there
is a conflict of interest between your direct management of CCF’s finances as an
employee and your duty, as a board member, to see to it that donor and sponsor
monies are spent responsibly and effectively?”
My
second question is:
“Are you committed to the
precepts of transparency and accountability in either of your CCF roles or are these
just words used to impress sponsors and donors?”
On 3rd
August 2014 I wrote to you in your capacity as Chief Operating Officer. I have
pasted the letter below. You did not respond to it.
No member
of the Cambodian Children’s Fund board ever answers questions put to it by the
media, making a mockery of Charity Navigator’s 100% rating for transparency and
accountability.
CCF’s way
of dealing with the media is to issue press releases and count on their being
reported as news. The Cambodian media goes along with this, to its shame.
A few days
ago I asked some questions of fellow board member Samuel Robinson regarding
CCF’s Financial Statements. He did not answer them.
They can
be found on the Khmer440 blog at:
http://cambodia440.blogspot.com/2016/10/202-some-questions-for-samuel-robinson.html
I will
ask these same questions to you. Would you like to answer them Bob? If not, I
will make my way through the list of CCF board members in the hope that I
may find at least one board member with
a genuine commitment to the precepts of transparency and accountability.
I would
like to add one more question:
“Could you and the CCF board please provide
donors and sponsors (and curious journalists!) with a breakdown of the costs
involved in the category entitled:
“Direct
Program Expenses”?
Direct Program
Expenses in the financial year 2014/2015 amount to:
$2.7
million
Given
that the category “Compensation”
appears to refer to salaries paid by CCF (please correct me if I am wrong),
would it be fair to presume that this $2.7 million does not have a salary
component?
If this
be the case then, as far as I can tell (again, please correct me if I am wrong)
CCF claims to be spending $2.7 million on:
(1) The Child Protection Unit.
(2) CCF’s medical clinic
(3) Rice Support
and
(4) The Granny Program.
I have
not included World Housing in this list because the houses have been donated to
CCF by generous donors and sponsors. (Sponsors and donors who have been led to
believe they were giving the houses to impoverished Cambodian families, NOT to
CCF!)
Are there
other items that I have forgotten to include in this list of “Direct Program
Expenses”?
I imagine
that CCF’S most costly Direct Program Expense is the Child Protection Unit?
What
budget was allocated to the CPU in the financial year ending Dec 2015?
How much does it cost to run CCF’s medical
clinic for a year?
How much does the Granny Program cost?
How much does CCF’s ‘Rice Support’ program
cost each year?
I look
forward to your response, Bob, committed as you say you are to the precepts of
transparency and accountability.
cheers
Bob Alexander
Chief Operating
Officer
Cambodian
Children’s Fund
2416 Santa
Monica Boulevarde
PMB 833
3rd
August 2014
Dear Bob
I am a
filmmaker and journalist who has, for a few years now, been trying to obtain
from Scott Neeson answers to a few questions. He not only refuses to answer
questions from myself but refuses invitations to be interviewed by other
journalists who have similar questions to ask.
Upon your
appointment as Chief Operating Officer, Scott had the following to say about
you:
“Bob's
experience will ensure our donors receive a high degree of transparency and
accountability, with an assurance of good governance and sustainability."
Given Scott’s
own lack of commitment to the precepts of transparency and accountability, his
refusal to answer questions of the kind that sponsors and donors have a right
to ask, let me put some of these questions to yourself and see if I have more
luck:
- Did Mr Andrew
(Twiggy) Forrest give $1 million of FMG shares to the Cambodian Children’s
Fund?
- What is Scott
Neeson’s wage this year for the role he plays in running CCF?
- What is your
own wage as Chief Operating Officer?
- What
remuneration do members of the CCF Board receive per annum?
- What is the
wage of CCF teachers, cleaners and others involved in the day to day
running of CCF?
- Has CCF
bought land in Steung Meanchey with money provided by sponsors and donors?
- Has CCF built
homes on this land?
- Does CCF rent
these homes to families who have children living in any one of CCF’s
institutional residences?
- If CCF is
renting homes to the parents of CCF kids, how much rent are they required to
pay?
- How many
children sleep in each of CCF’s dormitories?
- How many
sponsors paying $140 a month does CCF have?
- How much of
this $140 a month goes to helping support the families of the kids living with
CCF.
There are many
other questions to be found on my blog – not just my own but those of others
with an interest in the work being done by CCF:
http://cambodianchildrensfund.blogspot.com/
best wishes
James Ricketson
The entire purpose of taking down previously posted tax returns, and no longer publishing current tax forms, is so that YOU can't get that information James. It is to obfuscate the corruption, while giving as few details as possible. Board member salaries are however included in the 990 report, as is Neeson's (which is the maximum amount he can earn free, of US tax, I believe.)
ReplyDeleteIf CCF can't, or won't, account for the apparent $3 million hole in the salaries component of its expenses sponsors and donors can be forgiven for wondering if this money has been corruptly siphoned off. If such a presumption is incorrect CCF can easily ease the concerns of sponsors and donors by itemising its salaries bill.
Deletehttp://www.sunstar.com.ph/cebu/local-news/2016/10/24/orphans-rescued-505556 Taking children from their families IS child trafficking!!
ReplyDeleteUpwards of $3 million of CCF sponsor and donor funds missing in action and the Cambodian media turns a blind eye. We all know that the Neese has bought the silence of Phnom Penh Post journalists but does he have Cambodia Daily journalisrts in hyis pocket too?
ReplyDeleteI sent the following email to the Cambodia Daily, the Phnom Penh Post, LICADHO and ADHOC TODAY:
Delete"I am more than usually curious to see if any English language newspaper is prepared to ask Scott Neeson the kinds of questions I ask; if there is any human rights organisation concerned that CCF spends as much money employing one member of staff for a year (according to its own figures) as an entire Cambodian family could live on for a year?
Do the media and human rights organisations believe it to be appropriate that Bob Alexander can be both Chief Operations Officer and a member of the board overseeing the actions of the Chief Operations officer?"
Both the Cambodia Daily and the Phnom Penh Post have good journalists working for them. They are unrelenting in their exposure of corruption within the Cambodian government. When it comes to corruption within the NGO industry, however, they remain silent. The Cambodian Children's Fund, and other unscrupulous NGOs in Cambodia can get away with murder )metaphorically speaking) secure in the knowledge that neither the Post nor the Daily is going to expose them.
ReplyDeleteHow about an unrelenting expose on a fair trial for David Fletcher? The corruption in that case is beyond appalling! Where are the human rights watchdogs? Where is the justice that an innocent man is sentenced to life for a crime that never happened but that APLE is complicit in?
ReplyDeleteDavid Fletcher was in Neeson's way. He needed to get rid of him. And he played his role in seeing to it that David Fletcher found himself in jail with no trial to speak of. Mr Fletcher has been in jail for 6 years now - thanks in part to Scott Neeson. After the illegal removal and detention of children it is what Neeson did to Mr Fletcher that has left me with zero respect for the man. Neeson is a fraud and the time will come when the mainstream media pays attention and exposes him; as was the case with Somaly Mam.
DeleteCorruption at GreatNonProfits is endless. 7 new reviews show up and you guessed it ALL FIVE STAR REVIEWS! I know that they have taken down HUNDREDS of honest, but not so flattering reviews. This corrupt organization is intent on deceiving the donor and refuses to report the truth!
ReplyDelete