Dear Bob Tufts
You are on the Cambodian
Children’s Fund board of directors. From what mutual associates have told me,
you are a decent man. How, then, can you and your fellow board members continue
to turn a blind eye, a deaf ear, to the scams perpetrated by Scott Neeson and
the two disgraced Australian Federal Police Officers (one a convicted felon) he
has at his side running CCF?
Have you asked Scott who
owns the land upon which the World Housing homes ‘gifted’ to poor families are
being built? Is it a matter of any concern to you and your fellow board members
that Scott has lied to donors and sponsors about who is the ultimate recipient
of the ‘gifted’ houses?
Is it a matter of any concern at all to you and your
fellow board members that CCF makes a profit from exploiting the poverty of
materially poor families who have children in CCF residential care?
You don’t believe me? OK,
fair enough. Would you like to meet some of these families? I can take you to them and you can ask, yourself,
whatever questions you wish to ask. If you do, and if you then check the veracity of the answers you receive, you will, if you have any decency, ask Scott:
“How can CCF
be receiving $150 a month in sponsorship monies per child in residential care
($1,800 a year) whilst the mother of this child earns $1,000 a year working in
the Phnom Penh Rubbish Dump to feed her remaining children?"
And what of a mother with
two kids in CCF residential care? Three kids? Do the maths, Bob, and then meet
the families; see where they live and ask the mothers (and sometimes the
fathers also) how much assistance they receive from CCF?
If you wish to take up this
challenge, to see for yourself, I will arrange it for you and any other
board members who might be curious to know if what CCF actually does to help
families matches the PR Scott churns out on his Facebook pages and in press
releases.
On a slightly different
topic:
As you know, Great Non
Profits, like Charity Navigator, is a scam. There is a sucker born every minute
and, alas, such suckers have big hearts and do not ask too many questions before they dig deep into their pockets. They
visit Great Non Profits and Charity Navigator expecting to find some semblance
of the truth and find, instead, more Scott Neeson lies.
A few weeks ago, I wrote the
following:
“The Great Non Profits
website has been brought to my attention again. This is where NGOs spruik their
goods. The latest comment, posted by Alan Lemon under the name Anthony Levitt, is a crude attempt by Alan at
discrediting me. Alan writes:
“The newest negative posts
all belong to an individual who is running a hate campaign against Cambodian
Children's Fund. Great Nonprofits are aware of this and regularly remove the
reviews. Unfortunately, this only leads to him posting them again and so they
remain at the top of the page.”
In fact I have never once
posted a comment on Great Non Profits. Maybe I should! And Alan Lemon knows
that I have not; that these (deserved) negative comments have been posted by
someone else – who has written to me, anonymously, to tell me so. And to tell
me that Alan Lemon knows that it is he, not me, making these comments.
Alan Lemon, like his boss,
Scott Neeson, is a liar.
Alan Lemon writes also:
“Cambodian Children's Fund
is one among many to be targeted by his blogging and troublemaking. Other
organizations have successfully sued for defamation. Others have restraining
orders and he has been arrested for harassment.”
Alan has one of his facts
right, but basically he is lying.
Yes, I was sued for
defamation by Citipointe Church. I exposed Pastor Leigh Ramsey and Pastor Brian
Mulheran as running an NGO that illegally removed children from their families.
They did this with the tacit approval of Naly Pilorge, of LICADHO. This is all
well documented and beyond dispute.
When Ramsey and Mulheran
were exposed as liars and frauds and kidnappers of Cambodian children, and
after Mulheran had put his threats against me in writing, the church arranged
for the Phnom Penh Municipal Court to hold a ‘trial’ to which I was not invited
to attend, to find me guilty of defaming the church.
To this day this NGO
continues to remove children from their families (girls) and force them to
become evangelical Christians and then raise money from donors and sponsors on
the grounds that these girls have been ‘rescued’ from the sex trade. Pastor
Leigh Ramsey should be in jail for her crimes. And Naly Pilorge should join her as an
accessory to the illegal removal of children from their families.
To this day, LICADHO
maintains a less than diplomatic silence when it comes to the removal of
children from their families by evangelical Christians. LICADHO’S list of
people deserving of having their human rights protected does not include
children stolen by evangelical Christians.
I am not conducting a ‘hate campaign’
against CCF. I am merely trying to point out that CCF runs a variety of money
making scams – the World Housing one of which is the most blatant in that Lemon
and Neeson (CCF as a whole) tells sponsors and donors that houses are being
‘gifted’ to poor families when there are being gifted to whoever owns the land
on which they are erected. This is stealing from the poor to give to the rich.
Human rights organizations in Cambodia, the media in Cambodia, turn a blind eye
to this scam of Neeson’s.
As for ‘restraining orders’
and being ‘arrested for harassment’ in Cambodia, Alan Lemon is lying yet again.
He has learnt well at the feet of his master – Scott Neeson, a pathological
liar and egomaniac who cannot keep himself out of any photo opportunity that
presents itself and will enable him to con a new lot of sponsors and donors to
contribute to his latest scam.
Check out Great Non Profits
for yourself:
I did get around to making a comment
on Great Non Profits. Unfortnately I did not keep a copy of it but it basically
said “Take what you read here about CCF with a grain of salt.”
My comment was
removed.
I then wrote the following to Great
Non Profits
"Dear Great Non
Profits
A comment I made
about the Cambodian Children's Fund in
Jan this year was deleted.
It would appear
that NGOs such as the Cambodian Children's Fund can either request of Great Non
Profits that certain less than favourable comments be deleted or, perhaps, pay
to have them deleted. If this latter be the case, then Great Non Profits is a
scam.
The Cambodian Children's
Fund is scam. This is well known within
Cambodia. The evidence is overwhelming. By deleting comments that point this
out to potential donors Great Non Profits is aiding and abetting in the
perpetuation of the Cambodian Children's Fund scams.
In the event that
you are unaware that CCF is a scam organisation you might like to publish my
latest comment as I have been blocked from doing so. If you do not publish it
then the credibility and integrity of Great Non Profits will not longer be open
to question.
“If you have come
to “Great Non Profits” looking for the truth about certain NGOs, certain
charities, beware.
Do not believe
what I say or suggest but do a little homework before you make your kind and
generous donation to this (the Cambodian Children’s Fund) and other charities.
This comment of
mine will be deleted before long because Great Nonprofits deletes reviews that are
honest and truthful, the Cambodian Children’s Fund in this instance, does not believe are favorable. Great
Non Profits leaves reviews in place that it knows to be lies.
that, while
leaving reviews that they know are lies. The organize the reviews via a
title called ‘featured reviews’. In doing so Great Non Profits deceive
the potential donor and deny him/her from finding out the truth about NGOs like
the Cambodian Children’s Fund.
In doing your
research into the Cambodian Children’s Fund you could start here:
Take both my own
observations and those of the Cambodian Children’s Fund with a grain of salt.
Think for yourself but please do some research before putting your hand into
your pocket.
Best wishes
James Ricketson"
I am awaiting a response from Great Non Profits
I agree with what you say about GreatNonProfits. It is a scam!
ReplyDeleteShouldn't Scott Neeson be in jail for taking children from their families and Bob Tufts right beside him as an accomplice?
Who are the two disgraced Police officers working for CCF?
Alan Lemon and James McCabe!
DeleteRicketson, are you saying that Neeson has given 300 homes to the person that owns the land ( instead of to the impoverished families), and no one knows who owns the land???!!! CCF is hiding the person that owns the land?? Now come on.
ReplyDeleteWhy isn't the press asking Tufts and Neeson about this? It is their job to expose corruption! Are all the newspapers in Neeson's pocket?
I've left comments on Great Non Profits too and they just get deleted if they are critical. Maybe GNP writes its own negative comments and then charges Neeson to have them taken down like those guys who take care of your car for a price to prevent the wheels from being slashed. Fucking con artists leeching off the poor. Why does the Cambodian government tolerate them? Stupid question. These lowlifes make megabucks and can splash the money around to get what they want no questins asked
ReplyDeleteJames, I know Team Neeson continues to call you a "Conspiracy Theorist". I just saw this definition which apply applies: A term to discredit those who have seen through the bullshit".
ReplyDeleteKeep up your good work!
Team Neeson must be busy taking children from their families today, so that Scott Neeson can PIMP them to donors! What a Saint he is.
ReplyDeleteIs Bob Tufts there helping to keep the children from their mothers?
Bob Tufts and the other members of the CCF board are complicit in the illegal removal of children from their families and should be in jail. How dare they exploit the poverty of the Cambodian population in this way!
DeleteIs there anyone that you are not going to attack Ricketson you dog!
ReplyDelete'Attack' is not the right word. Holding those in positions of power accountable for their actions is my aim.
DeleteBob Tufts, as a member of the CCF board, is well aware, as are all his board member colleagues, that Neeson is a liar and that he is stealing houses intended for poor families; that he is exploiting the poverty of the families he is supposedly helping. I do not say this lightly. If Bob Tufts had any integrity, any desire to know the truth, he would meet with families I know of and whose poverty has been exploited by Neeson. Tufts could talk with them and make up his own mind if they are telling the truth or not. I think Tufts knows, in advance, that what they would have to tell him would make him and the board complicit in the scams, so it is best not to meet them. Neither he nor his fellow board members will be able, when Neeson is finally (and irrevocably) exposed as a fraud, be able to say " We had no idea!"
Government shuts down orphanages oveer abuses
ReplyDeleteAccording to the report, 190 children were transferred from seven orphanages that failed to live up to minimum standards of care and management.
A further 275 children were moved into family or community care – the first small step in the government’s stated mission to reduce the 11,017 children in orphanages by 30 per cent by 2018.
Iman Morooka, UNICEF Cambodia’s chief of communications, supported the government’s move to reduce the number of children living in residential care, saying more than three-quarters (77 per cent) of children in orphanages have at least one living parent.
“Residential care has been shown to place children at increased risk of physical and sexual abuse,” she said via email.
unquote
The big Question now is when the CCF with fugitive Australian Staff will follow suit.
http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/govt-shuts-down-orphanages-over-abuses
Great move, many of these children can be returned to their families, but then how would Neeson PIMP the children?
DeleteAny response from supposedly Great nonprofits James? Would National media be interested in how they receive donors?
ReplyDeleteWhy dont you contact world media yourself you coward instead of asking Ricketson to do it for you all the time. I know why you won't do it - because you are a snake who speaks with a fork tongue. A very good chance you smile at Neeson and McCabe and crew only to backstab them whilst you hide behind your computer screen. You are all cowards.
DeleteDear Anonymous 4.24
DeleteNo, nothing back from Great Non Profits.
As with pretty much everything Neeson touches, Great Non Profits is a scam. Wealthy NGOs like CCF pay to guarantee that they get good ratings and pay again to have negative comments removed. It is the perfect charity scam. Sponsors and donors who are, quite rightly suspicious of scamsters like Neeson, go to Great Non Profits hoping to get an unbiased opinion about a charity, an NGO, little realising that they are being lied to.
The problem is that there is no-one anywhere in the world that is monitoring these crooks. Charities, NGOs, that exploit the poverty of poor people for financial gain are, from amoral point of view, only one step above those who exploit poor women in brothels.
Neeson is a man devoid of morals when it comes to making money. Anything goes. Add this to his undoubted skill at marketing and the docility of the Cambodian media and you have the perfect recipe for an ongoing scam. Who is going to stop it? And, of course, you have human rights groups that know about it but keep their mouths shut, avert their eyes, cover their ears and bury their heads in the sand. LICADHO has known for years about the illegal removal of children from families, about scam orphanages but try and find any LICADHO reports on these human rights abuses and you will find that they are virtually non-existent.
I know Bob Tufts well. He is a decent man. I can only presume that he has not looked closely at what this Mr Neeson is doing in Cambodia. I have read enough here to have grave doubts about Mr Neeson and his organisation
ReplyDeleteIt is Bob Tufts' job, and that of the rest of the board, to know how CCF monies are being spent. I have written to Mr Tufts several times, he is well aware of this blog and so has had ample opportunity to check the facts for himself. He either has not bothered or not interested in the facts - as long as the dollars keep rolling in.
DeleteDear Bob Tufts
ReplyDeleteA young woman living in a small community by the Phnom Penh rubbish dump was feeling very ill yesterday. I took her to hospital. The doctor diagnosed malnutrition and prescribed healthy food + some medicine. She is seriously calcium deficient and with a very low white blood cell count.
Cost of hospital, doctor and medicine $35.
Not a lot of money for me to pay but an impossible amount for this young woman’s mother, to pay. She and the children living with her (she has 8 in all) earns only $1,000 a year working in the rubbish dump.
There is nothing unusual about this story, of course, except that two of this teenage woman’s sisters are sponsored children in Cambodian Children’s Fund.
Given that all children in CCF residential care have at least one sponsor paying at least $150 a month, CCF is taking in $3,600 a year as it takes care of this mother two’s children. And they are going to state schools!
It gets worse.
For a few years this mother had five kids in CCF residential care as she worked in the dump. I have met, spoken with and filmed all the children.
So, for several years CCF was taking in $9,000 every year to take care of five this mother’s 5 kids. And what part of this $9,000 was going to help the rest of the family? $250 a year in ‘rice support’. And how much was CCF contributing towards the health of the family? Zero. Hence my need to take this young woman to hospital last night. This is the truth about how CCF cares for families. What Scott Neeson write on his Facebook page, what he says in his press releases, is public relations and not the truth. And you know it. And the rest of the CCF board knows it to be so. Given that you are reasonably wealthy it cannot be monetary gain that keeps you on the board. What is it, I wonder?
The young woman I took to the hospital last night, and two of her brothers, eventually had to leave CCF to go back to work in the dump to help support their mother and other other siblings.
Between them all they earn around $1,000 a year working in the rubbish dump, suffer from malnutrition and cannot afford to see a doctor or go to hospital whilst CCF takes in $3,600 a year for the two children that remain in CCF care. Is this fair? Is this right? Clearly, you think this is OK and I can no longer entertain the possibility that you are, as I had heard from others, a ‘decent’ man. A decent man would not tolerate Scott Neeson’s lies, his stealing of houses donated to poor families and his exploitation of impoverished families such as the one I have been helping myself, and filming with this past 18 months.
This is not an isolated case. There is another family in the same position – two kids with CCF whilst mum and her 14 year old daughter work in the rubbish dump and cannot afford to eat anything other than white rice, flavoured with salt, much of the time.
These families have no idea that CCF is making a lot of money out of them. I have not told them as this would open up a hornet’s nest within the community that I am not equipped to deal with.
CCF is very fortunate that you have, in the Phnom Penh Post and Khmer Times two newspapers who see their role as providing free public relations to Scott Neeson’s many scams; two newspapers that will quite happily cut and past CCF press releases and pretend that they are both accurate and ’news’.
I hope one day, when true democracy comes to Cambodia, that a class action suit is taken out against CCF and other sham (and scam) ‘orphanages’ and that Neeson and you members of the board are sued for huge amounts of money.
Wow James 35 dollars ,you're a f**king Hero!
DeleteWhat was wrong with taking her to the medical clinic in Steung Meanchey that Bob Tufts funded , or are all the medical staff working there in on the scam as well?
And I would also ask is it not beyond the realms of possibility if by that one act of generosity, Bob Tufts would have saved hundreds of lives both young and old with his kindness and do you not think he deserves a little bit of recognition for he and his wifes kindness? .
Funnily enough I can't seem to find Bob Tufts name plastered all over the internet bragging about his good deeds ,unlike some who are continually blowing their own trumpet sad pitiful cunts that they are James !
You are a sad dangerous waste of ink my friend and I really feel for all the good people that you are defaming with your insane twisted drivel.
You need to realize have the credibility of a wood louse mate and that nobody is taking you seriously and never will,no matter how much shite you post!
I feel sorry for you!
All the best
Spartacus.
Dear Spartacus
DeleteWhy do you feel the need to sprinkle your comment with so much personal abuse? Do you think it adds to your argument? Do you think it makes you look smart? Referring, somewhat hysterically, to my "insane twisted drivel" and saying that I have "the credibility of a wood louse" undermines what could otherwise be a sensible comment. I will respond to the sensible parts of it.
(1) No, $35 is not a lot of money and I am certainly no hero for paying for this young woman's medical expenses or for those of many others in this community when they needed help.
It is important to bear in mind, however, that this young woman has two sisters who are in residential care with CCF and brining in $300 a month in revenue for CCF whilst CCF does nothing to help the rest of the family - living on $1000 a year working in the dump.
(2) I have been visiting this community for close to two years now. When i am in Phnom Penh I visit once a day or once every two days. it is rare tat a day goes by when someone does not need some pointment for a rash, pills for a stomach ache, antiseptic cream for an infection, treatment for a baby with diarorhhea (never have been able to spell that word) and so on.
These people have no way of getting to Bob Tuft's clinic in Steung Meanchy. They have no mode of transport and the clinic is really a very long way away. There are closer clinics and it to these that I amasked by the people to take them.
In the case of the young woman in question a visit to the clinic revealed that she needed to be in hospital, so I took her to the closest hospital - the one recommended by the clinic.
(3) In all the time I have been visiting this community I have never once seen anyone from CCF present enquiring after people's health or offering assistance in any way.
(4) I am not an NGO. I am a filmmaker. For 20 years now I have tried to help as much as I can but my resources are limited.
(5) All the reports I have had of Bob and his wife have been positive. He is a decent man, I have been told. Up until recently I presumed that Bob must have been kept in the dark by Scott Neeson and so have alerted him (and other members of the CCF board) to a series of questions I believe he and the board need to ask Scott. Bob and other members of the board have a duty of care to the children in residential care (700+) and to the children's families.
When I got to your "sad pitiful cunt' comment I could not help but think, :This is Scott Neeson," but then decided to give you the benefit of the doubt and work on the assumption that you are not Scott Neeson. You simply share his potty mouth and write in a similar hysterical tone.
As for no-one taking me seriously, why do you put so much effort into commenting on a bloc written by someone with the "credibility of a wood louse"?
I suggest that you stop reading this dreadful blog and find something more constructive to do with your time.
i heard from several sources that james ricketson is a pedophile and is wanted in europe.
ReplyDeleteYeah! And I heard from even more reliable sources that it was not APLE that sent a couple of cops around to James' hotel to intimidate him but Neeson.
DeleteYour so called sources Anonymous 8:15 are total idiots and so are you!
DeleteAnonymous 8:15, your agenda must include that taking children from their families is a wonderful thing and that stealing houses intended for the poor, and giving them to the rich, is a wonderful thing? You are quite the human being!!
DeleteDear Scott Neeson (aka Anonymous 8.15)
DeleteSurely you can do better than this when it comes to insults!
Tufts is as complicit as complicit can be! He is also complicit in the housing scam!
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous 7.0
ReplyDeleteNot sure what point you are trying to make here but if you are serious, I doubt it very much
You are not very bright Ricketson for a supposed investigative journalist. If you walk down street 136 or any other street in Phnom Penh catering to fat ugly white foreign men you will understand why being a member of the Cambodian Children's Fund board is such an attractive proposition
ReplyDeleteLOL Anon 2.15, out of interest where does James Ricketson the fat ugly white man openly admit to staying when he is in Phnom Penh - that's right, Street 136. You as well as James appear to be fully aware of the attractions of street 136. I am starting to seriously consider some of the insults thrown at James previously after your comments on the sexual habits of men who are attracted to Street 136
DeleteLOL Anon 2.15, out of interest where does James Ricketson the fat ugly white man openly admit to staying when he is in Phnom Penh - that's right, Street 136. You as well as James appear to be fully aware of the attractions of street 136. I am starting to seriously consider some of the insults thrown at James previously after your comments on the sexual habits of men who are attracted to Street 136
DeleteLOL Anon 2.15, out of interest where does James Ricketson the fat ugly white man openly admit to staying when he is in Phnom Penh - that's right, Street 136. You as well as James appear to be fully aware of the attractions of street 136. I am starting to seriously consider some of the insults thrown at James previously after your comments on the sexual habits of men who are attracted to Street 136
DeleteHas anybody heard if Fletch the Letch has croaked it yet. James has been very quiet on the subject for a while so possibly as an "investigative journalist" (not) he has finally uncovered the truth that Fletcher (along with maybe Wes) likes to play hide the sausage with underage girls - and maybe little boys too
ReplyDeleteScott Neeson
DeleteI would have thought, after 18 months of your our crude attempts at shooting the messenger, that it would have dawned on you that the tactic does not work. All these silly insults and your posting of porn does is highlight that you use such tactics to avoid dealing with the important issues; to avoid answering questions.
You, Bob Tufts and other members of the Cambodian Children's Fund board are engaged in a World Housing scam - houses given to the poor essentially stolen by CCF and given to the (comparatively) rich. No-one need rely on what I have written here to arrive at this conclusion. All they need to do is look back through the last 18 months of press releases in which you claimed to be 'gifting' homes to poor people, only to find that you do an about-turn when revealed (by me) to be lying and say, "Oh, no, actually we are renting them to poor families."
And then there is the 'we help families' scam. No you don't. You take the kids, place them in dormitories (2, 3 and 4 to a bed), send them to a free public school and rake in $150 per month in sponsorship monies per month whilst giving virtually no help at all to the rest of the family. As I have mentioned, the most extreme example of this is 5 kids from one family earning CCF $9,000 a year whilst the family is given $250 a year in rice support and no help at all in a medical emergency.
This exploitation of impoverished families is morally reprehensible and it is just as well for you (at the time being at least) that there is only one journalist in all of Cambodia (other than myself) interested in talking to such families and asking questions about your world Housing scam. This will change in time. n the meantime, Scott, keep trying to shoot the messenger. Keep posting these silly comments and pornographic photos. I am sure members of your Team find it all very amusing and think you are scoring hits when in fact you are making yourself look foolish.
well we know from numerous sources that Ricketson is a pedophile and wanted in europe.
ReplyDeleteNice try, Scott, but the messenger remains alive and well
DeleteYou are an ignorant fool Anonymous 8:16. Do you work at CCF with James McCabe and Alan Lemon?
Deleteare you also a pedophile? that is the only reason why you would defend the known pedophile james ricketson. we have heard from many sources that he is a pedophile and is wanted in europe.
DeleteDear Scott Neeson (aka anonymous 5.40)
DeleteReally, Scott, you want to carry on with this nonsense whilst CCF is struggling financially to stay afloat?
Despite Alan Lemon's continual references to me as a 'moron' I am not so stupid that I do not understand what all these 'pedophile' remarks are designed to achieve. I am supposed to get angry, be outraged, offended, lash out etc. This is the way trolls work and there is nothing more frustrating to a bully (which is what a troll is - an anonymous bully) than to not be taken seriously.
Actually, you do me a huge favour with these remarks. Each one is worth about 20 page views - not doubt from readers who sense that a slanging match may be about to take place and who do not want to miss the gladiatorial fun.
So, keep the silly comments coming.
Dear Bob Tufts
ReplyDeleteAs you will be aware by now, as all members of the CCF board will be aware, you have lost a major sponsor. She has done her homework, asked questions to which she was not provided with satisfactory answers, and has pulled the plug. No more large cheques will be forthcoming. Others will follow if they likewise ask questions and do their homework.
I wonder how many major sponsors like this lady CCF can afford to lose before you decide that your current incarceration-of-children-in-institutions funding model has passed its use-by date? And give it a radical overhaul?
CCF has the infrastructure in place to move to a new non-institutional model but I wonder if you and the board will have the sense to see and recognise this before it is too late!
Hollywood is famous for re-invention and with a Hollywood marketing man at the helm it should not be that difficult to re-brand CCF as an NGO that is genuinely (and not just in Facebook PR) committed to keeping families together. You know, or should know, that it would cost CCF much less money to assist children within their families, within their communities, so if CCF is feeling the pinch financially as sponsors drop away there is a practical imperative to return kids to their families.
For instance, in the case of the family I have written about above, instead of taking in $300 a month to keep two members of the family in institutional care, why not spend $150 a month reuniting the children with their family and seeing to it that that can attend a local school? There is a good school just a 20 minute bicycle ride from where the rest of the family lives. A very good school. The family has some problems but noting that a good social worker would not be able to assist with. The biggest problem, of course, is that the rest of the family suffers from malnutrition as a result of the very low in come the mother can earn in the rubbish dump. And there is no money for medical care when it is required.
And then there are the WORLD HOUSING houses. It would be a public relations coup to announce that CCF was, in fact, going to give these houses to the poor families that are at present renting them.
Rebranding of what has become a tired CCF brand may save the NGO from going under – as you know will be the case if you lose a couple more major sponsors.
Would the lost donor happen to be a certain fat lady from OZ?
DeleteWhat great news that a major donor will stop giving to CCF! I think they have lost a few more major donors. These numbers are a little rough and I'm not looking it up right now but in the tax year 2013, the top 5 donors gave 45% of CCF CONTRIBUTIONS, in 2014, the top 2 donors gave 55% of CONTRIBUTIONS. What happened to the other 3 large donors? Have they seen the light also?
ReplyDeleteKeep up your good work James!!
PS it also means that small donors gave LESS money to CCF in 2014, than they did in 2013! Maybe some are finally catching on!!
ReplyDeleteWhat a lot of spin with no clue what is happening Anon 9.02pm. To explain in figures you can understand I will give an EXAMPLE for every $100 of donations.
ReplyDeleteIf in 2013 the 5 top donors gave $26,7,4,4,4 they would have donated 45%. If in 2014 one of them increased their donation to $35, one increased to $20 and the other 3 stayed at $4 then the top 2 would have contributed 55% as you claim. In fact we should all be giving kudos to the two who gave more, but that does not support all the negative crap posted here does it.
Try thinking before opening mouth in future or at least getting somebody to explain basic maths to you. There are so many other possibilities of what happened your little fairy tale falls over at every stage.
Hey stupid asshole aka Anonymous 10:51. Yes two large donors gave more...ALL the other donors gave less. It is a model for disaster! It is a model for declining donor base. Not a model of growth. Impending doom if even one of those two large donors sees the light! Very sorry that you are too stupid or too blind to see it!!
DeleteThe fact is, between large and small donors, CCF has a declining donor base. If it loses one more major sponsor the NGO will be in trouble. The solution is a relatively easy one - reform CCF in such a way as it is serving families and communities. Donors and sponsors are more savvy these days; more suspicious of the kind of spin that Neeson churns out. The demise of CCF could happen very fast if it does not engage in some major reforms.
DeleteApparently Anonymous 10:51 supports taking children from families and giving houses to the rich so they can rent them to the impoverished!!
DeleteIf there is anyone with half a brain at CCF, these numbers have created major concern. I know a lot more about financial forecasting than the nitwit calling himself Anonymous 10:51!
DeleteAnon 2.00 your comments are too ignorant to even address and you obviously cannot understand even simple maths, how do you conclude ALL other donors gave less.
DeleteJames, this person does your cause no good at all
James, what proof do you have that CCF has a declining donor base, I hear the donor base is increasing.
Anon 2.41 and 2.46 I doubt you know anything about financial forecasting and knowing exactly who you are am surprised you can even spell it. Interesting however that as soon as I come out with some truth all the "Ricketson trolls" come out of the closet together within 46 minutes. My oh my I am more convinced by the day that Ricketson has only 1 ot 2 followers who make multiple posts
Anonymous 3:43, I'm very sorry that you can't do the maths. Are you a graduate of Neeson's school? The facts speak for themselves. Did you take any children from their families today?
DeleteAnonymous 3:43, I'm pretty sure that James has been praying, that YOU of all people, would be telling him how to run his website.
DeleteWas it the liar that has been telling you the donor base is growing? You are such a fool!!
CCF board members must bear responsibility and face accountability and seek seek answers to any allegations presented to them. It's clear these long standing issues are kept hidden deep within the CCF Channels for which Scott Neeson and his corrupt team are famed for . We praise you dedicated work James uncovering pursuing and exposing charity corruption and Child exploitation of these poor families . Criminal actives of NGOs collecting millions through child sponsors. While the children and families have no paperwork and in most cases have no idea they these charities are making money from them . And they receive little to nothing in return . Morals are nowhere to be seen with such Shameless NGOs
ReplyDeleteDear Alan Lemon (aka 3.43)
ReplyDeleteI have no idea how many people there are making comments. Perhaps multiple, as you do.
What I do know is that this blog receives between 200 and 500 page views a day. The page view rate rises fairly astronomically when you and other members of Team Neeson male abusive comments about me. There are clearly some readers hoping for some blood on the floor. Not sure if uts my blood or Neeson's.
As for your done base I can only rely on what my sources inside CCF tell me. You have lost a major sponsor. You know who this is and will not try to deny it if you have any sense. Yes, maybe the loss of this one sponsor is a one-off and CCF can weather the financial storm it has caused. On the other hand perhaps sponsors and donors are doing some research and can smell a rat. We shall see.
ReplyDeleteIf I were advising CCF I would say you need to undertake a major review if your modus operandi; that you need to move very quickly from your incarceration model (700+kids packed into dormitories like sardines) to a social (and funding) model that focuses on helping disadvantaged children within a family and community context.
No, the 'certain lady' is not Gina Rinehart.
ReplyDeleteDid Neeson pick another baffoon to represent CCF on this blog? Seems pretty clear that he has!
ReplyDeleteI think it might be the same disgraced ex-policeman officer who is now finished with his days assignment of cruising the PP hostess bars.
DeleteI'm sorry, yesterday we were so busy cruising the hostess bars that we didn't have time to take children from their mothers. Hopefully today will be a better day.��
ReplyDeleteTo all the trolls who keep repeating the same mantra that James is a pedophile and 'your information comes from reliable sources' ?
ReplyDeleteYour stupidity and low intellect is so obvious by continually repeating this claim without one credible piece of specific supporting evidence, you highlight what fools you are in your brainless attempt to support the CCF ,as we say in Oz in language I am sure you will understand " PUT UP OR SHUT UP " By just repeating the same lies over and over without any support you highlight that you have no way to defend the criminal and morally corrupt organization that is CCF . You continually avoid the valid questions that Janmes raises here , WHY ? instead you support the continuation of an an organization that purports to alleviate human suffering , instead it adds to human suffering , it is well documented that children in long term institutionalized "care " suffer not just in the the time that they are in the institution but for the rest of their lives .
Dear Anonymous 11.02
DeleteThanks for coming to my defence but it really isn't necessary. Team Neeson shoots itself in the foot each time one of its members makes stupid remarks of the kind that they specialise in. To any reader with an IQ over 100 this tactic will reveal itself for what it is - a pathetic attempt to shift the attention away from the questions being asked to the person asking the questions. Team Neeson hopes that if it can get at least some of the mud it slings to stick readers will forget the questions that have been asked. It is symptomatic of the stupidity and arrogance of Team Neeson members that they should have such a low opinion of the intelligence of visitors to this blog.
Bob Tufts has revealed himself, in his silence, to be as corrupt as Neeson. Tufts and the rest of the board know of the scams and choose to turn a blond eye. It is a decision that they will live to regret.
And the next generation of children.
DeleteDear Bob
ReplyDeleteI had an interesting conversation this morning with a former CCF girl. As I have mentioned already, she and two of her siblings left CCF in order to help their mother in the rubbish tip. Before they left, her mother had five children in all in institutional care at CCF. For five years. At $9,000 a year to CCF, that’s $45,000 CCF has made out of the poverty of this family.
For $5,000 CCF could have bought land and a house that would have made it possible for the family to stay together. With a low interest loan of $5,000 you could have helped the family set up a business such that they could, today, be self-sufficient. Instead, the family is as badly off as it was when CCF first entered the picture. When the two kids that are still in CCF care leave, the family will be back where it started.
It gets worse. It always does when Scott Neeson has his fingers in any pie.
The family has no idea that CCF has been receiving such vast sums of money from sponsors. When I told the oldest daughter this morning (she asked, I had not planned on telling her) her jaw dropped and then tears glistened in her eyes. I asked her if her mother had entered into any contractual arrangement with CCF. She shook her head. No. I asked the question three times. I wanted to be sure that I had not misheard or that she had not understood the question. No, her mother had never been offered a contract; nor had she ever signed one.
So, not only has CCF made $45,000 or so out of this family it has done so with no legal agreement at all with the mother of the children.
At the very least such behaviour is morally reprehensible. At the worst, it is illegal. I draw your attention to:
Law on Suppression of Human Trafficking and Sexual Exploitation
Article 8:Definition of Unlawful Removal
The act of unlawful removal removal in this act shall mean to:
1) Remove a person from his/her current place of residence to a place under the actor’s or a third persons control by means of force, threat, deception, abuse of power, or enticement, or
2) Without legal authority or any other legal justification to do so to take a minor person under general custody or curatorship or legal custody away from the legal custody of the parents, care taker or guardian.
Article 9: Unlawful removal, inter alia, of Minor
A person who unlawfully removes a minor or a person under general custody or curatorship or legal custody shall be punished with imprisonment for 2 to 5 years.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/7259345/Law-on-Suppression-of-Human-Trafficking-and-Sexual-Exploitation-15022008-English
In a country in which the rule of law applied, a strong case could be made that CCF has removed these children (along with hundreds of others) “by means of…deception, abuse of power, or enticement…”; that CCF has never had “legal authority” to take these or other children into “general custody or curatorship or legal custody away from the legal custody of the parents, care taker or guardian…”
I hope that one rule of law will prevail in Cambodia and that some, or all, the families CCF whose children CCF has removed sue you, the board and Scott Neeson.
Bob Tufts is complicit in this autrocity in the same way that Pol Pots stooges were complicit and liable in PolPots atrocities. History will not be kind and a just legal system will be less kind!!! Beware to anyone leaving their fingerprints on this!!
DeleteWhy are the human rights organizations silent on this issue of illegally removing children from their homes? How does this differ from kidnapping children? Neeson then extorts money from well-meaning donors for the children he has kidnapped? WTF? What happened to the child's right to have a family?
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous 4.00
DeleteThe answer to your question, at least as far as LICADHO is concerned, can be found by googling 'Licadho orphanages' or something like this to find out when LICADHO issued a report or registered a complaint about fake orphanages of the kind that CCF runs. There is virtually nothing. LICADHO does not care that certain NGOs (and CCF is only one) commit human rights abuses in their removal of children from their families. LICADHO expresses concern about all sorts of human rights abuses - as long as they are perpetrated by the Cambodian government - but remains silent about abuses perpetrated by NGOs who are in the business of rescuing children from their families. Illegal thumb printed contracts that parents are forced to sign? Not a problem as far as LICADHO is concerned? Breaches of Cambodian law in the removal and retention of children from their families? Not a problem. The people doing this 'removing' are 'good people' (very often Christians) who have only the best interests of the the children at heart! LICADHO is OK with 'good intentions'. If this leads to the breakup of families so be it. Hey, these kids are better off growing up in a crowded dormitory with three meals a day than with their impoverished non-Christian families!
Whilst Dr Kek Pung (Galibru) is a good women with a huge heart, the organisation she founded has become one that, as far as I can see, does little other than write reports. I doubt that anyone much reads these reports. And even if they do, what positive impact have these thousands of reports had on the protection of ordinary Cambodian people from their rapacious government? What battles has LICADHO won? Or are good intentions enough? Good intentions and strident reports expressing 'concern' or even 'extreme concern' about the latest human rights abuse practiced by the government!
I can imagine a bunch of wealthy Lexus-driving Cambodian Keleptocrats sipping their martins and laughing together a the latest report condemning them (0r at least expressing 'concern') about their latest land grab or whatever crime they have committed lately.
Writing reports that no-one reads or which have no impact is a waster of time - though it make make the writers feel good about themselves.
So, don't expect any time soon for LICADHO or ADHOC to take an interest in the moral and legal crimes committed by CCF. To do so would raise the question: "What about all the other NGOs doing what CCF does and basing their funding model on the removal of chilren from their families?"
james ricketson spending his time with young underage girls, big surprise. i think the girls would be more horrified to lesrn that james is nothing but a filthy liar and a pedophile who is wanted in europe and soon to be cambodia.
ReplyDeleteDear Scott Neeson
ReplyDeleteCome on, you can do bette than this! You need to spice up such comments with some details - like where in Europe I am wanted and for what? As for your 'soon to be Cambodia' I guess you can afford to make this a reality if you so choose. Be careful, though, it may backfire. Don't presume that because you could so easily set up David Fletcher that the same could apply to me. This about his a little and get some advice. It may not be a wise move.
im pretty sure having the pedohpile james ricketson arrested would be the best thing for young children all over the world.
ReplyDeleteThis is how insipid Ricketsons blog is - even the blowflies on the worst blog in Cambodia Khmer 440, think that Ricketson is a dud. Must be hard being classified a dud by others duds Rickets. Geez your mother must be proud, aspiring movie creator, investigative journalist and self propelled guru of the media world, ending up writing a blog that defames people.
ReplyDeleteRe: Fletch the Letch
Postby scobienz » Fri Feb 26, 2016 8:31 am
What Your Name? wrote:
I was talking to one of DF's former colleagues recently, who indicated that he'd written several books since being banged up. Is it true? Who would publish something from someone with such notoriety if it's related to his recent incarceration and former misdemoneurs? In Australia, any royalties gained from infamy are confiscated.
Has has claimed to be doing so, and a few passages of incoherent and cringe-worthy nonsense has appeared on Ricketson's site. It will never be published though - it's truly awful stuff. Ricketson himself has claimed to be writing a book on the subject too, but if it's anything like his site it will consist simply of one blog about a letter to Phil Hammond repeated over and over and over again.
Are all of these idiot Team Neeson posters, disgraced Australian ex-policeman??
ReplyDeleteDear Scott Neeson/Alan Lemon (aka Anonymous 6.18)
ReplyDeleteOh dear, will you never learn!
You still think that if you keep shooting the messenger for long enough, he will die? That if you throw enough mud it will stick? Since you posted this stupid comment I have had 12 page views. By the end of the day the number will have risen. There are some amongst my readers who are probably just looking for a good slanging match (with no other excitement in their lives) but there will be others who are wondering if you both, if Bob Tufts or any member of the CCF board will ever get arounds to answering questions. Questions like:
"Who owns the land upon which the World Housing homes ('gifted' to poor families) are being built?"
Why did you lie about the gifting, Scott?
As for whether or not David Fletcher's book is any good, or whether it gets published, why is this relevant to the pertinent fact here - which is that despite CCF insisting that it is transparent and accountable Neeson, Lemon, Bob Tufts et al refuse to answer any questions.
You have recently lost one major sponsor and you will lose more if you don't reform CCF. Over to you, Scott, Alan, Bob Tufts...
Hey fuckwit - I posted the Khmer440 related post and I am not Neeson and I dont work for CCF. The trouble with you Ricketson is that you have no grasp of reality. The moral of the story from my post is that a large percentage of people think you are dropkick with a born to lose tattoo on your forehead.
ReplyDeleteDear Neeson Troll (aka Anonymous 12.32)
DeleteDo you really think I care that someone on Khmer440 (or many people who read and contribute to Khmer440) think I'm a fuckwit? I never read it. Can't be bothered.
As for you, if I am such a fuckwit and have no grasp of reality why do you bother to visit this blog and comment? Have you got nothing better to do with your life than to bait fuckwits and people who have no sense of reality?
But do keep your silly comments coming. They help my page count enormously.
Yes you do care loser.
DeleteGiddy up. Its beer o'clock. And I am going to give two fucks about Fletcher sitting in a jail cell whilst I throw down ice cold beers.
ReplyDeleteWell, aren't you a hero, Anonymous 12.34
Deletehahaha looks you got under Rickets skin anon 12.34. Well said1
DeleteI've heard a whisper that the Australian Federal Police have been looking at Ricketsons activities in Cambodia and they have liaised with the Cambodian police. Its only a matter of time.
ReplyDeleteThank God for some comic relief on a Friday afternoon. How many beers have you had so far? I expect more comments a little later - when you are drunk and your spelling and grammar being to fail you.
DeleteNo beers yet but I will after work and I will enjoy them knowing that you are having no impact on any of the people you are constantly defaming. You are a failure Ricketson.
DeleteI have some better information than you anon 12.36 - I spoke to a staff member at the Australian Embassy a week ago. This person told me that the unofficial tone of the Embassy is to ignore any communication or correspondence from Ricketson and that he has been labelled a vexatious complainant. The staff member also told me that the British Embassy in Cambodia has communicated with the Australian Embassy about the constant defaming blogs against British dignitaries, and the British Embassy have been instructed not to engage with Ricketson as well. It must be hard being hated by everyone Mr. Ricketson
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous 12.47
DeleteI fail to see what this has to do with Scott Neeson lying about the 'gifting' of houses to poof families but if what you write is true it is clear that Embassies collude to try and blackball anyone who asks questions that Embassies do not wish to answer. Given that I have not communicated with the Australian Embassy about Mr. Fletcher ( and why would I given that he is not an Australian citizen) the fact that the British Enbassy has seen fit to communicate with the Aistralian Embassy about Mr Fletcher (if true) says something about the way diplomacy works. The fact is, and it is a fact verified by documents provided to Mr Fletcher under FOI legislation, the British Embassy in Thailand destroyed Mr Fletcher's passport in the full knowledge that it contained evidence that was pertinent to his court case, if such a court case were ever to take place. And, when the blatant lies told by Embassy staff were pointed out to them, the FCO decided that the best way to deal with staff being exposed as liars was to refuse to communicate with either Mr Fletcher or myself anymore...
To be continued
...continuing...
DeleteIf what you write about the Australin and British Embassies colluding to brand me as a vexatious complainant (and I have no way of knowing whether or not you are telling the truth, Alan) this throws a small beam of light onto the way in which Embassies help each other manufacture spin.
Now here's an interest ing thing, Alan. It is quite clearly not appropriate for the British Embassy to be enlisting the aid of the Australian embassy in this way. Nor is it appropriate for the Australin Embassy to be sharing this information with a lawyer working for CCF. Whoever did so has breached the diplomatic code of conduct that s/he has promised to adhere to.
Still, it is useful for me to know that CCF and the Australian Embassy are in communication with each other about how to deal with my exposure of Neeson as a liar.
Thanks for that, Alan
Dear Team Neeson Troll (aka Anonymous 12.50)
ReplyDeleteIf it were that easy to get under my skin, as you so eloquently put it, I would have given up this blog a few weeks after I started it when personal abuse of the kind you specialise in began to be posted. Not only does it not bother me (I could, after all so easily delete it), I welcome it. Not so much because it increases the number of page views I get but because it highlights both the intellectual and moral poverty of people such as yourself. You believe that rather than answer questions all you need to do is engage in personal abuse, throw in a few swear words and you can win whatever argument you think is taking place. Only fools could fail to see that you engage in this silly schoolboy form of abuse to distract attention away from the questions that matter - such as Scott Neeson lying about the 'gifting' of homes to poor families.
Dear CCF employees and board members
ReplyDeleteAs major sponsors drop away you may like to ask why!
Is it because they are asking questions and not getting satisfactory answers?
Have any of you asked any of the questions I have been asking Scott for years now and the CCF board for the last 15 months?
If not, you could start here:
http://cambodia440.blogspot.com/2016/02/185-challenge-for-bob-tufts-member-of.html
You are all morally responsible for what goes on at CCF and it is your duty to ask questions and not be fed spin answers of the kind that Scott specializes in.
It is my suspicion, without radical reform, that CCF is headed for financial disaster as more and more sponsors and donors smell a rat and as funds dry up.
The CCF incarceration-of-children model is past its use-by date, as all research shows. Send the 700 kids you have in residential care back to their families and help them within a family and community context. Stop lying about giving homes to poor families through World Housing and actually give the houses to the poor families. Don’t give the houses to the owner of the land – who then becomes the owner of the houses ‘gifted’ to poor families.
Somaly Mam was immune from criticism for many years after everyone in Cambodia knew that she was a liar. The same will apply with CCF unless you mend your ways and convince Scott that it is time for a radical change; time for him to stop lying and to speak the truth.
CCF has all the infrastructure in place to do good work if the NGO undergoes the kinds of radical changes it needs to undergo in order to survive and thrive in the future.
Yes, there may be a sucker born every minute but there is another cliché that is worth bearing in mind: “You can fool some people all the time and all the people some of the time but you can’t fool all the people all of the time.”
I don’t think CCF has all that much timeleft in which to fool everyone.
My guess is that CCF is at a tipping point and that if it loses the confidence of sponsors and donors the whole house of cards could collapse quite fast.
Don’t say you weren’t warned.
best wishes
James Ricketson
Cunt. Thatr all i hsve to say. Your a cunt Rickets
ReplyDeleteWhat a collection of human lowlifes that exist in Phnom Penh!! Yes, that is you Anonymous 6:14. You are a credit to Team Neeson along with James McCabe and Alan Lemon!
DeleteAnonymous 6:14, your spelling has improved!!
DeleteNo reply from Bob Tufts James?
ReplyDeleteNo, Anonymous 1.34, no word back from Bob Tufts.
DeleteThe CCF board has no commitment at all to the precepts of transparency and accountability. All difficult or challenging questions are ignored. Scott Neeson and his board rely on press releases, photo opportunities and Facebook to tell whatever lies need to be told to keep the sponsors happy and the donations flowing in.
It is an NGO built on spin.
I will work my way through the board one by one but the individuals that make it up have clearly made a decision that it will not answer questions – most particularly “Who owns the land upon which the 360 World Housing homes are being erected?”
Now that we know the homes have not been ‘gifted’ to poor families, the question of who owns the $ 1 million worth of homes looms large. Or it should loom large. This is a scam of gigantic proportions but the Cambodian media is giving Neeson and his board a free pass when it comes to the World Housing scam. No questions will be asked, no investigative journalism conducted. Neeson and CCF are home free. The newspapers will, however, publish whatever press release Neeson puts out in the future about the latest houses that have been ‘gifted’ to poor families.
Who owns the land that the Cripps school is being built on?
DeleteWhen will someone arrange for Rickets to have an accident and put us out of our misery?
ReplyDeleteIs Scott Neeson requiring you to follow this blog? How sad that you signed up to kiss Neeson's a$$!
DeleteI think the press in Cambodia has forgotten that their job is to REPORT the NEWS, NOT TO COVER IT UP!!
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous 8.32
DeleteI am no longer surprised that the Cambodian media does not think that a scam involving around $1 million worth of houses, 'gifted' to poor families, wind up being 'gifted' to someone else.
More comments from the owner of Khmer440 that proves you are a disgrace Ricketson.
ReplyDeleteRe: The David Fletcher Thread
Postby scobienz » Fri Feb 26, 2016 9:08 pm
Lucky Lucan wrote:
Ricketson is still railing against the CCF and injustice etc, just not as regularly as before. I don't find him too entertaining, he's just like one of those lunatics who stand on street corners ranting and raving while everyone does their best to avoid eye-contact.
http://cambodia440.blogspot.com/
Consider yourself lucky you're not on his mailing list to receive the 44th version of the same fucking letter he has written to Phil Hammond in recent months.
There seems to be an implicit pact by all 50 recipients. Accept the emails and for the love of god don't reply because it will encourage him.
Wow, that is really great proof!
DeleteWow, Anonymous 9.47
DeleteSo, if a comment is published on Khmer440 it must be true!
I have been officially 'proven' to be a 'disgrace' by Khmer440. I feel honoured.
As for Lord Lucan being the owner of Khmer440, I doubt it. I have had some communication with the new owner (after Peter Hogan) and he struck me as being a man of some intelligence. Lord Lucan is not. He's "just like one of those lunatics who" use other people's blogs to vent their frustration and anger.
As for Phillip Hammond, I haven't actually written to him for a while now. Thanks for reminding me. I owe him another letter. of course he will not respond to it. He and the FCO, having been caught out, with their own documents (obtained through FOI), to have been lying about the 'accidental' destruction of Mr Fletcher's passport, have decided that the best course of action is to refuse to communicate with me any further. Neat trick, eh!
You are retarded Ricketson - Scobienz is the owner of Khmer440 and if you had actually read my post above instead of writing drivel you would see that Scobienze actually made the comments. So its nice that Scobienz strikes you as a nice guy because he feeling isn't reciprocated - he thinks you are the lunatic.
DeleteDear Anonymous 5.14
DeleteI didn't say that I thought the owner of Khmer440 was a "nice guy". I said that he was "a man of some intelligence." There is a difference. It is possible to be "a man of some intelligence" and a very unpleasant human being. And it is possible to be a "nice guy" and not all that bright. And, of course, as you would know from experience, it is possible to be an unpleasant human being and not to be all that bright.
More drivel from the retard Ricketson
DeleteDear Team Neeson Troll (aka Anonymous 6.05)
DeleteYou have, very eloquently, revealed the type of person you are; the type of person who goes in to bat for Scott Neeson. As with all Team Neeson Trolls you do not answer questions or address issues. All you are capable of is verbal abuse. You need to stop reading this blog and get a life
Neeson is on Facebook bragging that they served over 88,000 meals to impoverished children. That is approximately 250 meals per day. Meanwhile he is bringing in over $30,000 a day in donations. Fletcher used to feed more than that in a day on a single dump run! In the picture is a child eating noodles, which have a very low nutritional value. WTF???
ReplyDeleteThat's a good one Anonymous 11:49. Let me help with the maths for the mathematically challenged disgraced ex-policeman that work for CCF... Noodles for one person costs about 20 cents, so he spends (250 X .20) about $50 a day on this project while he brings in over $30,000 a day. What a hero!!
DeleteDear Anonymous 11.49
DeleteCCF's Facebook page is a marketing exercise. All the facts in it need to be taken with a huge grain of salt. As a marketing man Neeson will say/write whatever he feels he must in order to keep the dollars flowing into CCF's accounts. Because no-one ever checks to see if he is lying (and he usually is) he can get away with whatever he chooses to publish - as long as it has a cute kid in it (preferably a girl, in Neeson's arms) or a smiling happy family overjoyed to now be renting from CCF the home that was, in fact,given to them.
Neeson is a scoundrel. A clever scoundrel.
So you are saying that Neeson isn't even feeding then food that is NUTRITIOUS?? Feeding malnourished children with noodles that has little nutritional value? Was this Neeson's brilliant idea?
DeleteDear Anonymous 4.39
ReplyDeleteYou will be pleased to hear that I did have an accident a few days ago. The bad news, for you at least, is that I am still in the land of the living. A cut on the leg only. Dodgy brakes, sand on the road, travelling too close to a Lexus etc.
Cut on leg but nothing too much to worry about. Sorry to dissapoint :-)
Remember way way back when the guy that claims he has inside knowledge of Fletch's guilt also repeatedly claimed to have inside knowledge (and even has seen the court documents) of Ricketson's imminent arrest for defamation?
ReplyDeleteBeen arrested yet James?
So much for 'inside knowledge' and Chinese whispers (as if it ever had a legitimate place in sending a man to prison.)
Dear Anonymous 3.41
DeleteWhat the NGO mafia doesn't realise is that times have changed. it is no longer quite so easy to arrange to have people you want to get rid of arrested. Yes, if you have a lot of money and are prepared to really splash it around, you may be able to pull it off - just not as easily as when David Fletcher was railroaded by a gaggle of incompetent and corrupt NGOs who, for their own different reasons, wanted a 'scalp' to help them. In the case of Neeson getting rid of David Fletcher was part of his master plan to become King of the Rubbish Dump. Fletcher was running an operation that Neeson saw as rivalling his empire building dreams and wanted him gone. He got his wish and David Fletcher has paid a huge price as a result of the lies spread by Neeson - namely that he was 'grooming' young girls. I know that you are reading this, Scott, so please, if you have any evidence that Mr Fletcher was 'grooming' young girls come out with it. Make it public. Share it with the police; with the court.
You won't because you were lying about the 'grooming'.
So, if you want to make a few calls and 'arrange' for me to be arrested, go for it. I think you will find that times have changed a little since you las ticked up the phone and used your money and poltical connections to get your own way.
I wouldn't know what to expect from Team Neeson other than lies and stupidity!
Delete