Dear
Peter Hogan
I
am making a film and writing a book that will feature the circumstances
surrounding the arrest and jailing of David Fletcher for the rape of Yang Dany.
I
wish to give all those directly or indirectly involved in this saga an
opportunity to answer some questions that have arisen for me as I consider the
evidence for and against Fletcher.
I
am starting with you because, by your own admission, you played a significant
role in the fate that has befallen Mr Fletcher – sentenced to 10 years in jail
for a rape he may or may not have committed.
On
Wed 2nd Oct 2013, at 3.33 pm, you posted the following comment on
Khmer440 under the moniker ‘keeping it riel’ in celebration of David Fletcher’s
recently announced jail sentence:
“Cold drinks will most certainly be taken this evening
to toast Fletcher's first night in his new abode.
I recall that 4(!) years ago when Grandslam and myself
hatched our plan, we made a sequential list of desirable outcomes beginning
with getting his 'charity' closed then moving onto having his
shithole-in-the-wall bar closed, having him outed in the press (and fuck, did
we achieve that one!) etc etc.
Today, the last box on the sheet ('Fletch in Prey Sar')
was finally ticked off so I'll allow myself a few strong drinkies in
celebration and will be raising my glass to Grandslam back in the UK.
Goodnight Cambodia and good mental
health.”
You
have congratulated yourself on a job well done, Peter. Now let’s see if you
deserve such self-praise.
The
question for me, as an investigative journalist and documentary filmmaker, is
whether or not there is sufficient evidence that Fletcher is guilty of rape for
him to have been convicted by the Phnom Penh Municipal Court.
You
and ‘Grandslam’ seem to entertain no doubts at all! Indeed, so convinced were
you and ‘Grandslam’ of David Fletcher’s guilt you devoted four years to
achieving the outcome you desired.
QUESTION: Who is Grandslam?
QUESTION: Do you believe, on
the basis of the evidence you have at your disposal, that David Fletcher is guilty of having raped
Yang Dany on 15th and 22nd March 2009? If so, could you
please share with Cambodia 440 readers just what this evidence is?
The
following quote from yourself, in the guise of ‘keeping it riel’ is evidence
not of Fletcher’s guilt or innocence but of your own feelings for the man.
“This thread isn't about NGO bashing or reputable charities.
It's about one man who's been a shitstain on the underpants of Cambodia since
he arrived (having been kicked out of the scuzziest corner of Thailand) three
(?) years ago.”
Could
it be, Pewter, that your dislike of Fletcher has coloured your judgment:
QUESTION: What evidence do you
have that Fletcher was ‘kicked out’ of Thailand?
QUESTION: What role did
Humphrey Collins, alias ‘martlatham’ play in the plan you ‘hatched’ four years
ago. Humphrey boasts of it in his own somewhat less than humble way on Sunday
20th June 2010 at 11.10 pm.
“Fletcher, my part in his downfall. I can see the
headline already. But will the Mirror buy my story? Stewie was the instigator,
I was merely the instrument. Will I have to share the loot with stews estate?”
And here is another Humphrey Collins gem:
“… I have known fletcher for three years. The guy is a
racist, xenophobic, lying, stealing cunt. And a controlling, lying child
abuser. Do I have to say any more?”
No, Humphrey, you don’t have to say more! You’ve said more than enough
for readers to form a pretty good idea of the sort of person you are. I will
have a few questions for you further down the track, however. In the meantime,
back to you, Peter:
On Mon May
17, 2010 5:08 pm, as ‘keeping it riel’ you
wrote:
“A handful of longstanding 440 members who I know in
real life and implicitly trust are already in the loop. The rest of you will
just have to wait. But, I guarantee it will be worth the wait.”
The loop you refer to is, of course, the plan you were, by your own
admission, instrumental in hatching to bring down David Fletcher. Along with
your co-conspirators!
Dear Cambodia 440 readers, remember this date. 17th May. This
is a little more than a month before Andrew Drummond wrote the article that set
in motion the sequence of events that led to David Fletcher’s arrest in
Thailand and to his receiving a 10 years jail sentence for raping Yang Dany.
Let’s
go back to as close to the beginning of your involvement in this saga as I have
been able to go to date.
On
18th July 2009 you wrote on Khmer440 of “a number of very serious
allegations against David Fletcher”:
“It
has been suggested that he is an on-the-run fugitive from British justice, has
stolen charity money meant for homeless Khmers and, as an added extra, has an
unnatural interest in small girls.”
Your use of the
phrase “it has been suggested” is disingenuous. It is you who is making the
suggestion in public and throwing it out there for your readers/audience to
comment on.
QUESTION: What evidence did you have in July 2009 that Fletcher had “an
unnatural interest in small girls.”?
QUESTION: What do you consider to constitute ‘unnatural interest’?
QUESTION: Do you have any evidence, in October 2014, that Fletcher had
“an unnatural interest in small girls.” If so, could you please let me know
what it is?
On 3rd July Kit Hargreaves, alias, Bubble T, wrote of David
Fletcher:
“I
decided to do my own research, and here were my conclusions:
Lots
of people don't like the guy. That in itself is fortunately not a crime, plenty
of people don't like me either. - There doesn't seem to be any real evidence of
any untoward activities with kids. I saw KiR's supposedly incriminating photo
yesterday, and it was crap, just a picture of a fat old white guy hugging some
Khmer kids at a rubbish dump. I've been told many times that "there are
credible people who have seen this, that, blah blah blah", but not one of
them will stand up and say it themselves, leading me to suspect they are full
of shit. The initial thread on him…totally lost the plot when people started
publicly accusing someone they barely know of being a pedophile. I'm not cool
with this happening on my website, and if it happens again, you'd better have a
lot more evidence than a picture of people having a group hug… Just
because someone posts something on this site, doesn't mean I agree with it.”
Kit’s response
here, at the very beginning of the ‘witch hunt’ to ‘get’ Fletcher is both
commonsensical and acknowledges that no-one should be accused in public of a
crime if the accusation is not backed up by solid evidence. Leaving aside the
question of defamation, I am sure, Peter, that you would not appreciate having
unsubstantiated allegations thrown around in public about you. Am I right? And
this applies to others reading this.
I have a lot of
evidence that has not, to date, seen the light of day because no-one has
bothered to go looking for it. This evidence suggests, very strongly, that
David Fletcher is not guilty of having raped Yang Dany. Indeed, the evidence
suggests that it was virtually impossible for Fletcher to have raped Yang Dany
under the circumstances presented to the court. I will be presenting this
evidence, in full, in due course.
In the meantime I
invite anyone who is reading this blog who might have evidence that I do not
have regarding David Fletcher to send it to me – either via this blog or to my
email address:
Whilst I would
prefer that such ‘evidence’ not be presented to me anonymously, I can
understand why it might be. And, if confidentially is required, I can promise
that also, in writing.
I am interested in
the facts of this case; in facts backed up by evidence. Whilst providing an
interesting insight into the thoughts processes of certain expats, statements
such as the following, from ‘Captain Bonez’ are not being sought.
“…if he wasnt such a filthy fuck in the beginning though
then he might not be flying blind through this shitstorm, who cares how and why
he gets convicted, the guy is pure filth covered in skin, fuck him, i hope he
dies, alone.”
This was ‘Captain
Bonez’s’ contribution to the discussion about whether or not Fletcher had been
convicted on the basis of evidence or rumour, innuendo and scuttlebutt.
Here is another of
Captain Bonez’s contributions on the same topic:
“God, you bunch of hippie fucking faggots, throw
democracy out the window just for a minute (not the rest of time) and let this
cunt rot, rant over, im gonna order some bread and croquettes and get filthy
with some brown sauce.”
I will not delete
comments such as these. Indeed, I will delete nothing.
….to
be continued
You are a cunt, Mr Ricketson, just like that kiddie-fiddler Fletcher. You should rot in jail like him the scumbag.
ReplyDeleteThe reason why you are still banned Ricketson and why you will always be banned is that Scott Neeson is the new owner of Khmer440 and does not tolerate anyone who says nasty things about his megolomania and the multi-millionaire empire he is carving out for himself in Cambodia exploiting poor people. Watch you back. Neeson has powerful friends.
ReplyDelete